Photo: Getty Images
The Supreme Court has chosen not to review a New York law that requires handgun owners to demonstrate "good moral character," leaving the law intact. This decision maintains the state's restrictions on carrying firearms in "sensitive" locations such as schools, parks, and theaters. The law defines "good moral character" as having the essential character, temperament, and judgment necessary to be entrusted with a weapon, ensuring it is used safely.
Gun rights groups challenged the law, arguing that the extensive list of restricted locations effectively discourages most people from carrying guns. The plaintiffs, including five New Yorkers with firearm licenses, claimed the law's scope made carrying a weapon too risky. The case was influenced by the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which struck down a requirement for residents to show good cause to carry a handgun outside their homes.
According to CNN, the Supreme Court did not provide an explanation for its decision, and there were no noted dissents. The ruling is seen as a victory for New York officials and gun control advocates, who argue that the law helps ensure public safety. New York Governor Kathy Hochul praised the decision, stating that the state's strong gun safety laws save lives.
The Associated Press reported that the appeals court upheld the law's provisions but struck down a requirement for applicants to disclose social media accounts and banned carrying concealed guns onto private property without explicit consent. Despite the Supreme Court's decision, gun rights organizations, such as Gun Owners of America, vow to continue fighting for gun owners' rights nationwide.