Photo: MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images
New York officials are weighing in after the firing of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a move that follows a series of controversies surrounding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). On Thursday (March 6), reactions poured in from both state and federal lawmakers, reflecting a mix of relief and calls for broader reform.
According to NY State of Politics, New York Governor Kathy Hochul—who had publicly called for Noem’s dismissal as early as January—said, "The President should listen to me more often." Governor Hochul's comments highlight her ongoing push for changes at DHS and her influence in national security conversations.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer took a broader view, stating that the department’s challenges are "more than just about one person" and indicating his support for deeper institutional reforms. Schumer has previously called for restructuring federal immigration agencies rather than abolishing them outright, arguing for “reform” rather than elimination, as reported by PolitiFact.
Meanwhile, Hudson Valley Congressman Mike Lawler expressed optimism about the nomination of Oklahoma Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin as Noem’s replacement, saying that Mullin would "do a great job" and ensure the department moves forward without further turmoil.
This leadership change comes after heightened scrutiny of DHS policies and operations, especially regarding immigration enforcement. While some Democratic leaders, like Schumer, have called for major changes, there is no consensus in Congress on eliminating agencies like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Experts note that only Congress can abolish such agencies, and most reform efforts focus on restructuring rather than removal, as detailed in recent analyses.
With Senator Mullin’s nomination pending Senate confirmation, attention remains on how the next DHS leader will address both ongoing controversies and longstanding calls for reform. The reaction from New York’s elected officials underscores the state’s active role in shaping national debates over security and immigration policy.